Jones, Hollie S and Williams, Emily L and Bridge, Craig A and Marchant, Dave and Midgley, Adrian W and Micklewright, Dominic and Mc Naughton, Lars R (2013) Physiological and Psychological Effects of Deception on Pacing Strategy and Performance: A Review. Sports Medicine, 43 (12). pp. 1243-1257. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1
Jones, Hollie S and Williams, Emily L and Bridge, Craig A and Marchant, Dave and Midgley, Adrian W and Micklewright, Dominic and Mc Naughton, Lars R (2013) Physiological and Psychological Effects of Deception on Pacing Strategy and Performance: A Review. Sports Medicine, 43 (12). pp. 1243-1257. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1
Jones, Hollie S and Williams, Emily L and Bridge, Craig A and Marchant, Dave and Midgley, Adrian W and Micklewright, Dominic and Mc Naughton, Lars R (2013) Physiological and Psychological Effects of Deception on Pacing Strategy and Performance: A Review. Sports Medicine, 43 (12). pp. 1243-1257. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0094-1
Abstract
The aim of an optimal pacing strategy during exercise is to enhance performance whilst ensuring physiological limits are not surpassed, which has been shown to result in a metabolic reserve at the end of the exercise. There has been debate surrounding the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain how pace is regulated, with more recent research investigating a central control of exercise regulation. Deception has recently emerged as a common, practical approach to manipulate key variables during exercise. There are a number of ways in which deception interventions have been designed, each intending to gain particular insights into pacing behaviour and performance. Deception methodologies can be conceptualised according to a number of dimensions such as deception timing (prior to or during exercise), presentation frequency (blind, discontinuous or continuous) and type of deception (performance, biofeedback or environmental feedback). However, research evidence on the effects of deception has been perplexing and the use of complex designs and varied methodologies makes it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions about how pacing strategy and performance are affected by deception. This review examines existing research in the area of deception and pacing strategies, and provides a critical appraisal of the different methodological approaches used to date. It is hoped that this analysis will inform the direction and methodology of future investigations in this area by addressing the mechanisms through which deception impacts upon performance and by elucidating the potential application of deception techniques in training and competitive settings. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; Fatigue; Exercise; Deception; Energy Metabolism; Sports; Athletic Performance |
Subjects: | Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2015 08:02 |
Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2024 05:55 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/10371 |