Poesio, M and Artstein, R (2005) The reliability of anaphoric annotation, reconsidered. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky, ? - ?, Ann Arbor.
Poesio, M and Artstein, R (2005) The reliability of anaphoric annotation, reconsidered. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky, ? - ?, Ann Arbor.
Poesio, M and Artstein, R (2005) The reliability of anaphoric annotation, reconsidered. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky, ? - ?, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
We report the results of a study of the reliability of anaphoric annotation which (i) involved a substantial number of naive subjects, (ii) used Krippendorff's ? instead of K to measure agreement, as recently proposed by Passonneau, and (iii) allowed annotators to mark anaphoric expressions as ambiguous.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Published proceedings: _not provided_ - Notes: |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2015 10:04 |
| Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 18:46 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/12185 |