Booth, AL and Nolen, PJ (2014) Can Risk-taking Preferences be Modified? Some Experimental Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 61 (1). pp. 7-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu018
Booth, AL and Nolen, PJ (2014) Can Risk-taking Preferences be Modified? Some Experimental Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 61 (1). pp. 7-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu018
Booth, AL and Nolen, PJ (2014) Can Risk-taking Preferences be Modified? Some Experimental Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 61 (1). pp. 7-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu018
Abstract
We summarize our two sets of controlled experiments designed to see whether single-sex classes within co-educational environments modify students' risk-taking attitudes. In Booth and Nolen (2012b), subjects are in school years 10 and 11, while in Booth et al. (2014), they are first-year university students randomly assigned to single-sex and co-educational classes. Both studies show that while on average females are significantly less likely than men to make risky choices, on exposure to single-sex environments they behave the same as the males. Thus, part of the observed gender difference in behaviour under uncertainty found in previous studies might reflect social learning rather than inherent gender traits.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender risk preferences single-sex groups cognitive ability |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2015 12:18 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 10:05 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/12286 |