MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC and PARRY, DAVID and ROBINSON, TRACY and DEACON, GREG and RENFREE, ANDREW and GIBSON, ALAN ST CLAIR and MATTHEWS, WILLIAM J (2015) Risk Perception Influences Athletic Pacing Strategy. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47 (5). pp. 1026-1037. DOI https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000500
MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC and PARRY, DAVID and ROBINSON, TRACY and DEACON, GREG and RENFREE, ANDREW and GIBSON, ALAN ST CLAIR and MATTHEWS, WILLIAM J (2015) Risk Perception Influences Athletic Pacing Strategy. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47 (5). pp. 1026-1037. DOI https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000500
MICKLEWRIGHT, DOMINIC and PARRY, DAVID and ROBINSON, TRACY and DEACON, GREG and RENFREE, ANDREW and GIBSON, ALAN ST CLAIR and MATTHEWS, WILLIAM J (2015) Risk Perception Influences Athletic Pacing Strategy. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47 (5). pp. 1026-1037. DOI https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000500
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to examine risk taking and risk perception associations with perceived exertion, pacing, and performance in athletes. Methods: Two experiments were conducted in which risk perception was assessed using the domain-specific risk taking (DOSPERT) scale in 20 novice cyclists (experiment 1) and 32 experienced ultramarathon runners (experiment 2). In experiment 1, participants predicted their pace and then performed a 5-km maximum effort cycling time trial on a calibrated Kingcycle mounted bicycle. Split times and perceived exertion were recorded every kilometer. In experiment 2, each participant predicted their split times before running a 100-km ultramarathon. Split times and perceived exertion were recorded at seven checkpoints. In both experiments, higher and lower risk perception groups were created using median split of DOSPERT scores. Results: In experiment 1, pace during the first kilometer was faster among lower risk perceivers compared with higher risk perceivers (t(18) = 2.0, P = 0.03) and faster among higher risk takers compared with lower risk takers (t(18) = 2.2, P = 0.02). Actual pace was slower than predicted pace during the first kilometer in both the higher risk perceivers (t(9) = j4.2, P = 0.001) and lower risk perceivers (t(9) = j1.8, P = 0.049). In experiment 2, pace during the first 36 km was faster among lower risk perceivers compared with higher risk perceivers (t(16) = 2.0, P = 0.03). Irrespective of risk perception group, actual pace was slower than predicted pace during the first 18 km (t(16) = 8.9, P G 0.001) and from 18 to 36 km (t(16) = 4.0, P G 0.001). In both experiments, there was no difference in performance between higher and lower risk perception groups. Conclusions: Initial pace is associated with an individual's perception of risk, with low perceptions of risk being associated with a faster starting pace. Large differences between predicted and actual pace suggest that the performance template lacks accuracy, perhaps indicating greater reliance on momentary pacing decisions rather than preplanned strategy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | CYCLING; RUNNING; MARATHON; PERCEIVED EXERTION; EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Jun 2015 16:48 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Nov 2025 06:05 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/14034 |
Available files
Filename: OA-2194_Micklewright-Parry-Robinson-Deacon-Renfree-Gibson-Matthews-in-press.pdf