Roberts, Maxwell J and Newton, Elizabeth J (2011) Rapid-response versus free-time selection tasks using different logical connectives. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (7). pp. 858-872. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.584526
Roberts, Maxwell J and Newton, Elizabeth J (2011) Rapid-response versus free-time selection tasks using different logical connectives. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (7). pp. 858-872. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.584526
Roberts, Maxwell J and Newton, Elizabeth J (2011) Rapid-response versus free-time selection tasks using different logical connectives. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (7). pp. 858-872. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.584526
Abstract
When reasoning with conditional statements (i.e., if [not] p then [not] q), people tend to display matching bias: Options that match the entities named in the rule are selected even when logically inappropriate. Three different Wason selection tasks were administered under free-time and rapid-response formats. For the latter, individual cards were presented for one second, and required a response within a further one second. Previous research using these formats (Roberts & Newton, 2001) has shown that this increases matching bias, in line with the action of preconscious heuristic processes which direct attention towards relevant aspects of a problem, but whose action can be overturned if there is sufficient time to apply analytic reasoning processes. The selection tasks administered included a standard abstract conditional task, a disjunctive version (i.e., either [not] p or [not] q), and a conditional task in which the cards showed explicitly negated values. Both conditional tasks demonstrated matching bias, but under rapid-response presentation, matching bias only increased for the standard conditional and disjunctive tasks. Overall, the data support Evans (e.g., 2006) heuristic-analytic framework albeit with some caveats, and it is suggested that the broad question, of whether individual selection task formats show or do not show matching bias, requires more detailed investigation. © 2011 Psychology Press Ltd.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Matching bias; Reasoning; Wason selection task |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 24 Nov 2011 16:21 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:08 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/1589 |