Rogerson, M and Gladwell, VF and Gallagher, DJ and Barton, JL (2016) Influences of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (4). p. 363. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040363
Rogerson, M and Gladwell, VF and Gallagher, DJ and Barton, JL (2016) Influences of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (4). p. 363. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040363
Rogerson, M and Gladwell, VF and Gallagher, DJ and Barton, JL (2016) Influences of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (4). p. 363. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040363
Abstract
This study addressed a methodological gap by comparing psychological and social outcomes of exercise in green outdoors versus built indoors settings, whilst rigorously controlling exercise mode and intensity. The hypotheses were that greater improvements or more desirable values for directed attention, mood, perceived exertion, social interaction time, intention for future exercise behaviour and enjoyment would be associated with outdoors compared to indoors exercise. Following a baseline session, paired participants completed two conditions of 15 min of cycling on an ergometer placed outside in a natural environment and inside in a laboratory setting in a randomized, counter-balanced order. At pre- and post-exercise, directed attention was measured with the digit span backwards task, and mood was assessed with the Profile of Mood States. During the exercise session, visual and verbal interactions were recorded by means of experimenter observations. After each exercise session, participants provided self-repo rts of their enjoyment of the exercise, perceived exertion and intention for future exercise in the same environment. Social interaction time was significantly greater during outdoors exercise versus indoors; on average, participants engaged in three minutes more social interaction during exercise outdoors compared to indoors. Social interaction time significantly predicted intention for future exercise in the outdoors condition, but did not in the indoor condition. There was a significant time by condition interaction for directed attention. Scores worsened in the indoors condition, but improved in the outdoors condition. There was no statistically-significant time by condition interaction for mood and no significant difference between conditions for either perceived exertion or intention. Taken together, these findings show that exercise in a natural environment may promote directed attention and social interactions, which may positively influence future exercise intentions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | green exercise; wellbeing; directed attention; exercise environments; affect; perceived exertion; intention; exercise behaviour; social interaction |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2016 12:12 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 19:57 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/16696 |
Available files
Filename: Influences of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0