Jütten, Timo (2016) Sexual Objectification. Ethics, 127 (1). pp. 27-49. DOI https://doi.org/10.1086/687331
Jütten, Timo (2016) Sexual Objectification. Ethics, 127 (1). pp. 27-49. DOI https://doi.org/10.1086/687331
Jütten, Timo (2016) Sexual Objectification. Ethics, 127 (1). pp. 27-49. DOI https://doi.org/10.1086/687331
Abstract
According to Martha Nussbaum, objectification is essentially a form of instrumentalization or use. I argue that this instrumentalization account fails to capture the distinctive harms and wrongs of sexual objectification, because it does not explain the relationship between instrumentalization and the processes of social stereotyping that make it possible. I develop an imposition account of sexual objectification that provides such an explanation and, therefore, should be preferred over the instrumentalization account. It draws on a contrast between imposition and self-presentation and explains why sexual objectification, understood as the imposition of sex object status on women, is harmful and wrong.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Philosophical, Historical and Interdisciplinary Studies, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2016 09:08 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 15:58 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17279 |
Available files
Filename: Jütten 2016 (from Journal).pdf