King, Anthony (2016) In Favor of “Leader Proofing”. Daedalus, 145 (3). pp. 124-137. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00402
King, Anthony (2016) In Favor of “Leader Proofing”. Daedalus, 145 (3). pp. 124-137. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00402
King, Anthony (2016) In Favor of “Leader Proofing”. Daedalus, 145 (3). pp. 124-137. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00402
Abstract
<jats:p> Although it is widely assumed that successful polities require strong leaders, something like the opposite is probably the case. A successful political system may well be one that has no need of strong leaders and may even eschew them. Strong leaders may occasionally be desirable in any polity, but those occasions are–or should be–rare. As often as not (possibly more often than not) strong leaders pose substantial risks. They are liable to do as much damage as good, possibly more. There is a lot to be said for any polity's political culture and institutions having built into them a fair amount of “leader proofing.” </jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 11 Aug 2016 14:10 |
Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2024 11:12 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17406 |
Available files
Filename: daed_a_00402.pdf