Ozili, Peterson K (2017) Bank earnings smoothing, audit quality and procyclicality in Africa. Review of Accounting and Finance, 16 (2). pp. 142-161. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-12-2015-0188
Ozili, Peterson K (2017) Bank earnings smoothing, audit quality and procyclicality in Africa. Review of Accounting and Finance, 16 (2). pp. 142-161. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-12-2015-0188
Ozili, Peterson K (2017) Bank earnings smoothing, audit quality and procyclicality in Africa. Review of Accounting and Finance, 16 (2). pp. 142-161. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-12-2015-0188
Abstract
<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine whether the way African banks use loan loss provisions (LLP) to smooth earnings is influenced by capital market motivations and the type of auditor, after controlling for non-discretionary determinants of provisions and fluctuations in the business cycle.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>To test the income smoothing hypothesis, the model was estimated using panel least square with White’s robust standard error correction, as well as, with and without period fixed effect.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings support the income smoothing hypothesis and indicate that African banks use LLP to smooth earnings; listed African banks use LLP to smooth earnings to a greater extent compared to non-listed African banks, possibly, for capital market reasons; income smoothing via LLP is not reduced among African banks with Big 4 auditors; and after controlling for macroeconomic fluctuation, there is evidence that bank provisioning is procyclical with fluctuations in the business cycle.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The findings have three implications. One, listed African banks smooth income because they are more visible to investors; investors do not view stock price fluctuations as a good signal. Securities market regulators in African countries should enforce strict disclosure rules that reduce earnings smoothing practices to improve the transparency of bank earnings in the region. Two, the presence of a Big 4 auditor did not improve the informativeness of LLP estimates among African banks. Three, the evidence for procyclical provisioning suggest the need for dynamic LLP system in Africa.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper is the first cross-country African study to investigate whether provisions-based income smoothing decreases with the presence of a Big 4 auditor. The findings indicate that this is not the case among African banks.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Loan Loss Provisions; Earnings Management; Dynamic Provisioning; Income Smoothing; Audit Quality; Procyclicality; Africa |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Essex Business School Faculty of Social Sciences > Essex Business School > Essex Finance Centre |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 06 Sep 2016 10:54 |
Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2024 11:12 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17466 |
Available files
Filename: Author Accepted Manuscript - Copy.pdf