Briggsl, Emma V and Carrl, Eloise CJ and Whittakerl, Maggie S (2011) Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Pain, 15 (8). pp. 789-795. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.006
Briggsl, Emma V and Carrl, Eloise CJ and Whittakerl, Maggie S (2011) Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Pain, 15 (8). pp. 789-795. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.006
Briggsl, Emma V and Carrl, Eloise CJ and Whittakerl, Maggie S (2011) Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Pain, 15 (8). pp. 789-795. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.006
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The prevalence and burden of pain has long been reported as problematic. Comprehensive pain education in undergraduate programmes is essential for developing knowledgeable, skilled and effective healthcare professionals. This cross‐sectional survey describes the nature, content and learning strategies for pain curricula in undergraduate healthcare programmes in major universities in the United Kingdom (UK). Document analysis also highlighted gaps in pain‐related standards from professional regulators and a higher education quality assurance body. The sample consisted of 19 higher education institutions delivering 108 programmes across dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy and veterinary science.</jats:p><jats:p>Seventy‐four (68.5%) questionnaires were returned averaging 12.0 h of pain content with physiotherapy and veterinary science students receiving the highest input. Pain education accounted for less than 1% of programme hours for some disciplines. Traditional teaching methods dominated (e.g. lectures 87.8%) and only two programmes had fully implemented the International Association for the Study of Pain's (IASP) curricula. Minimal pain‐related standards were found from professional regulators and the quality assurance documents.</jats:p><jats:p>Pain education is variable across and within disciplines and interprofessional learning is minimal. Published curricula for pain education have been available for over 20 years but are rarely employed and pain is not a core part of regulatory and quality assurance standards for health professions. The hours of pain education is woefully inadequate given the prevalence and burden of pain. Recommendations include the introduction of pain‐related educational standards across all professions, greater integration of pain content in undergraduate programmes and interprofessional approaches to the topic.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pain education; Undergraduate curricula; Survey; Interprofessional learning |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2012 11:41 |
Last Modified: | 14 Sep 2023 10:12 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/2114 |