Galli, Giulia and Vadillo, Miguel A and Sirota, Miroslav and Feurra, Matteo and Medvedeva, Angela (2019) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Episodic Memory. Brain Stimulation, 12 (2). pp. 231-241. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.008
Galli, Giulia and Vadillo, Miguel A and Sirota, Miroslav and Feurra, Matteo and Medvedeva, Angela (2019) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Episodic Memory. Brain Stimulation, 12 (2). pp. 231-241. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.008
Galli, Giulia and Vadillo, Miguel A and Sirota, Miroslav and Feurra, Matteo and Medvedeva, Angela (2019) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Episodic Memory. Brain Stimulation, 12 (2). pp. 231-241. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.008
Abstract
Background: In the past decade, several studies have examined the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on long-term episodic memory formation and retrieval. These studies yielded conflicting results, likely due to differences in stimulation parameters, experimental design and outcome measures. Objectives: In this work we aimed to assess the robustness of tDCS effects on long-term episodic memory using a meta-analytical approach. Methods: We conducted four meta-analyses to analyse the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on memory accuracy and response times. We also used a moderator analysis to examine whether the size of tDCS effects varied as a function of specific stimulation parameters and experimental conditions. Results: Although all selected studies reported a significant effect of tDCS in at least one condition in the published paper, the results of the four meta-analyses showed only statistically non-significant close-to-zero effects. A moderator analysis suggested that for anodal tDCS, the duration of the stimulation and the task used to probe memory moderated the effectiveness of tDCS. For cathodal tDCS, site of stimulation was a significant moderator, although this result was based on few observations. Conclusions: To warrant theoretical advancement and practical implications, more rigorous research is needed to fully understand whether tDCS reliably modulates episodic memory, and the specific circumstances under which this modulation does, and does not, occur.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | meta-analysis; episodic memory; long-term memory; recall; recognition; transcranial direct current stimulation; non-invasive brain stimulation |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2018 10:11 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:45 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/23488 |
Available files
Filename: 1s20S1935861X18303747main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0