Walsh, Julie (2020) Confusing cases: Forrester, Stoller, Agnes, woman. History of the Human Sciences, 33 (3-4). pp. 15-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119897875
Walsh, Julie (2020) Confusing cases: Forrester, Stoller, Agnes, woman. History of the Human Sciences, 33 (3-4). pp. 15-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119897875
Walsh, Julie (2020) Confusing cases: Forrester, Stoller, Agnes, woman. History of the Human Sciences, 33 (3-4). pp. 15-32. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119897875
Abstract
This article pursues the hypothesis that there is a structural affinity between the case study as a genre of writing and the question of gendered subjectivity. With John Forrester’s chapter ‘Inventing Gender Identity: The Case of Agnes’ as my starting point, I ask how the case of Agnes continues to inform our understanding of different disciplinary approaches (sociological and psychoanalytic) to theorising gender. I establish a conversation between distinct, psychoanalytically informed feminisms (Simone De Beauvoir, Juliet Mitchell, Judith Butler and Denise Riley) to move from the mid-20th century, to contemporary cultural debate.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | case thinking/writing, feminisms, John Forrester, gender, psychoanalysis |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 29 Nov 2019 09:36 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:55 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/26099 |
Available files
Filename: Walsh(HHS-18-0034.R1).pdf