Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020). Psychological Science, 31 (3). pp. 342-344. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904134
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020). Psychological Science, 31 (3). pp. 342-344. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904134
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020). Psychological Science, 31 (3). pp. 342-344. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904134
Abstract
In this Reply to Richardson and colleagues (2020), we elaborate on their question, “Is there a gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)?”
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Gender Identity; Mathematics; Engineering; Technology; Sexism |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Mar 2020 13:27 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 17:33 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/26639 |