Ince, Baris (2022) Liquidity components: Commonality in liquidity, underreaction, and equity returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 60. p. 100730. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2022.100730
Ince, Baris (2022) Liquidity components: Commonality in liquidity, underreaction, and equity returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 60. p. 100730. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2022.100730
Ince, Baris (2022) Liquidity components: Commonality in liquidity, underreaction, and equity returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 60. p. 100730. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2022.100730
Abstract
I decompose firm-specific monthly-varying illiquidity into three components: (i) alpha, (ii) systematic, and (iii) idiosyncratic. Investors demand a premium to hold stocks with high systematic illiquidity. However, the systematic illiquidity premium disappears when very small stocks are excluded. On the other hand, investors tend to underreact to idiosyncratic (il)liquidity. Hence, stocks with high (low) idiosyncratic liquidity generate positive (negative) future risk-adjusted returns. More specifically, stocks in the highest idiosyncratic liquidity quintile generate 7% more annualized risk-adjusted return compared to stocks in the lowest idiosyncratic liquidity quintile.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Illiquidity; Idiosyncratic liquidity; Commonality in liquidity; Underreaction; Cross-section of returns |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 25 May 2022 10:10 |
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2022 12:32 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/32903 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S1386418122000234-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0