Flynn, Robert and Washer, Sam and Jeffries, Aaron R and Andrayas, Alexandria and Shireby, Gemma and Kumari, Meena and Schalkwyk, Leonard C and Mill, Jonathan and Hannon, Eilis (2022) Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays. Human Molecular Genetics, 31 (18). pp. 3181-3190. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112
Flynn, Robert and Washer, Sam and Jeffries, Aaron R and Andrayas, Alexandria and Shireby, Gemma and Kumari, Meena and Schalkwyk, Leonard C and Mill, Jonathan and Hannon, Eilis (2022) Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays. Human Molecular Genetics, 31 (18). pp. 3181-3190. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112
Flynn, Robert and Washer, Sam and Jeffries, Aaron R and Andrayas, Alexandria and Shireby, Gemma and Kumari, Meena and Schalkwyk, Leonard C and Mill, Jonathan and Hannon, Eilis (2022) Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays. Human Molecular Genetics, 31 (18). pp. 3181-3190. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112
Abstract
Most epigenetic epidemiology to date has utilized microarrays to identify positions in the genome where variation in DNA methylation is associated with environmental exposures or disease. However, these profile less than 3% of DNA methylation sites in the human genome, potentially missing affected loci and preventing the discovery of disrupted biological pathways. Third generation sequencing technologies, including Nanopore sequencing, have the potential to revolutionise the generation of epigenetic data, not only by providing genuine genome-wide coverage but profiling epigenetic modifications direct from native DNA. Here we assess the viability of using Nanopore sequencing for epidemiology by performing a comparison with DNA methylation quantified using the most comprehensive microarray available, the Illumina EPIC array. We implemented a CRISPR-Cas9 targeted sequencing approach in concert with Nanopore sequencing to profile DNA methylation in three genomic regions to attempt to rediscover genomic positions that existing technologies have shown are differentially methylated in tobacco smokers. Using Nanopore sequencing reads, DNA methylation was quantified at 1779 CpGs across three regions, providing a finer resolution of DNA methylation patterns compared to the EPIC array. The correlation of estimated levels of DNA methylation between platforms was high. Furthermore, we identified 12 CpGs where hypomethylation was significantly associated with smoking status, including 10 within the AHRR gene. In summary, Nanopore sequencing is a valid option for identifying genomic loci where large differences in DNAm are associated with a phenotype and has the potential to advance our understanding of the role differential methylation plays in the aetiology of complex disease.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; DNA Methylation; Epigenesis, Genetic; CpG Islands; Epigenomics; Nanopore Sequencing |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Science and Health > Life Sciences, School of Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 25 Sep 2022 15:07 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:41 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/33551 |
Available files
Filename: ddac112.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0