Alam, Sana and Zardari, Shehnila and Noor, Shaheena and Ahmed, Shakil and Mouratidis, Haralambos (2022) Trust Management in Social Internet of Things (SIoT): A Survey. IEEE Access, 10. pp. 108924-108954. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3213699
Alam, Sana and Zardari, Shehnila and Noor, Shaheena and Ahmed, Shakil and Mouratidis, Haralambos (2022) Trust Management in Social Internet of Things (SIoT): A Survey. IEEE Access, 10. pp. 108924-108954. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3213699
Alam, Sana and Zardari, Shehnila and Noor, Shaheena and Ahmed, Shakil and Mouratidis, Haralambos (2022) Trust Management in Social Internet of Things (SIoT): A Survey. IEEE Access, 10. pp. 108924-108954. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3213699
Abstract
A survey on trust management in the Social Internet of Things (SIoT) is provided, beginning with a discussion of SIoT architectures and relationships. Using a variety of publication databases, we describe efforts that focus on various trust management aspects of SIoT. Trust management models comprise three themes: trust computation, aggregation, and updates. Our study presents a detailed discussion of all three steps. Trust computation and trust aggregation depend upon Trust Attributes (TAs) for the calculation of local and global trust values. Our paper discusses many strategies for aggregating trust, but “Weighted Sum” is the most frequently used in the relevant studies. Our paper addresses trust computation and aggregation scenarios. Our work classifies research by TAs (Social Trust, Quality of Service). We’ve categorized the research (reputation-based, recommendation-based, knowledge-based) depending on the types of feedback/opinions used to calculate trust values (global feedback/opinion, feedback from a friend, trustor’s own opinion considering the trustee’s information). Our work classifies studies (policy-based, prediction-based, weighted sum-based/weighted linear combination-based) by trust computation/aggregation approach. Two trust-update schemes are discussed: time-driven and event-driven schemes, while most trust management models utilize an event-driven scheme. Both trust computation and aggregation need propagating trust values in a centralized, decentralized, or semi-centralized way. Our study covers classifying research by trust updates and propagation techniques. Trust models should provide resiliency to SIoT attacks. This analysis classifies SIoT attacks as collaborative or individual. We also discuss scenarios depicted in the relevant studies to incorporate resistance against trust-related attacks in SIoT. Studies suggest context-based or context-free trust management strategies. Our study categorizes studies based on context-based or context-free approaches. To gain the benefits of an immutable, privacy-preserving approach, a future trust management system should utilize Blockchain technology to support non-repudiation and tracking of trust relationships.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Social Internet of Things; SIoT; trust; architecture; attacks; future direction; application areas; event-driven; time-driven; context-based; trust attributes |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2022 10:38 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:50 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/34008 |
Available files
Filename: Trust_Management_in_Social_Internet_of_Things_SIoT_A_Survey.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0