Kismödi, Eszter and Bueno De Mesquita, Judith and Ibañez, Ximena Andión and Khosla, Rajat and Sepúlveda, Lilian (2012) Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions. Reproductive Health Matters, 20 (39). pp. 31-39. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(12)39610-9
Kismödi, Eszter and Bueno De Mesquita, Judith and Ibañez, Ximena Andión and Khosla, Rajat and Sepúlveda, Lilian (2012) Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions. Reproductive Health Matters, 20 (39). pp. 31-39. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(12)39610-9
Kismödi, Eszter and Bueno De Mesquita, Judith and Ibañez, Ximena Andión and Khosla, Rajat and Sepúlveda, Lilian (2012) Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions. Reproductive Health Matters, 20 (39). pp. 31-39. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(12)39610-9
Abstract
In 2011, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) issued two landmark decisions. In Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil, the first maternal death case decided by an international human rights body, it confirms that States have a human rights obligation to guarantee that all women, irrespective of their income or racial background, have access to timely, non-discriminatory, and appropriate maternal health services. In L.C. v. Peru, concerning a 13-year-old rape victim who was denied a therapeutic abortion and had an operation on her spine delayed that left her seriously disabled as a result, it established that the State should guarantee access to abortion when a woman's physical or mental health is in danger, decriminalise abortion when pregnancy results from rape or sexual abuse, review its restrictive interpretation of therapeutic abortion and establish a mechanism to ensure that reproductive rights are understood and observed in all health care facilities. Both cases affirm that accessible and good quality health services are vital to women's human rights and expand States' obligations in relation to these. They also affirm that States must ensure national accountability for sexual and reproductive health rights, and provide remedies and redress in the event of violations. And they reaffirm the importance of international human rights bodies as sources of accountability for sexual and reproductive rights violations, especially where national accountability is absent or ineffective.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; Abortion, Legal; Rape; International Cooperation; Human Rights; Women's Rights; Adolescent; Adult; Health Services Accessibility; Brazil; Female; Maternal Death |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Women K Law > K Law (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Essex Law School |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2012 10:43 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 17:44 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/3655 |
Available files
Filename: Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe legal abortion the significance of two ground breaking CEDAW decisions.pdf