Roehr-Brackin, Karen and Baranowska, Karolina and Pavlekovic, Renato and Scheffler, Pawel (2024) The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 108 (4). pp. 815-845. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12963
Roehr-Brackin, Karen and Baranowska, Karolina and Pavlekovic, Renato and Scheffler, Pawel (2024) The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 108 (4). pp. 815-845. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12963
Roehr-Brackin, Karen and Baranowska, Karolina and Pavlekovic, Renato and Scheffler, Pawel (2024) The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 108 (4). pp. 815-845. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12963
Abstract
Aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) research is of both theoretical and practical interest to second language (L2) learning, since it provides insights into the processes linking learner-internal individual difference factors and learner-external contextual variables including instructional approach – variables which jointly determine L2 outcomes. The present study employed a full range of aptitude measures mapped onto four explicit instructional conditions: auditory inductive, written inductive, mixed inductive, and mixed deductive. International volunteers (N = 136) completed online language lessons in beginners’ Polish targeting two morphological features. Participants’ phonetic and language-analytic abilities, level of multilingualism, and age predicted L2 achievement. A cluster analysis identified four learner profiles: high-aptitude, low-aptitude, memory-oriented, and analytically oriented. Deductive instruction seemed to neutralise individual differences in aptitude, while ATI effects were observed in the single-modality conditions, with auditory input favouring high-aptitude learners and written input favouring high-aptitude, analytic and memory-oriented learners. We discuss the theoretical and practical import of these findings by highlighting the ‘capital’ afforded by prior language learning experience, over and above the role of cognitive ability. In addition to the inductive/deductive contrast in explicit instruction, we emphasise the importance of input modality which has hitherto been neglected in the field.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | aptitude–treatment interactions; explicit instruction; individual differences; input modality; language learning aptitude; learner profiles |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Language and Linguistics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2024 11:17 |
Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2024 11:17 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38936 |
Available files
Filename: The Modern Language Journal - 2024 - Roehr‐Brackin - The role of individual learner differences in explicit language.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0