Rutjens, Bastiaan T and van der Linden, Sander and van der Lee, Romy and Zarzeczna, Natalia (2021) A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24 (4). pp. 513-517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211009708
Rutjens, Bastiaan T and van der Linden, Sander and van der Lee, Romy and Zarzeczna, Natalia (2021) A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24 (4). pp. 513-517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211009708
Rutjens, Bastiaan T and van der Linden, Sander and van der Lee, Romy and Zarzeczna, Natalia (2021) A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24 (4). pp. 513-517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211009708
Abstract
The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is posing a threat to the well-being of individuals and societies worldwide. Accordingly, research on why people increasingly doubt science and endorse “alternative facts” is flourishing. Much of this work has focused on identifying cognitive biases and individual differences. Importantly, however, the reasons that lead people to question mainstream scientific findings and share misinformation are also inherently tied to social processes that emerge out of divisive commitments to group identities and worldviews. In this special issue, we focus on the important and thus far neglected role of group processes in motivating science skepticism. The articles that feature in this special issue cover three core areas: the group-based roots of antiscience attitudes; the intergroup dynamics between science and conspiratorial thinking; and finally, insights about science denial related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Across all articles, we highlight the role of worldviews, identities, norms, religion, and other inter- and intragroup processes that shape antiscientific attitudes. We hope that this collection will inspire future research endeavors that take a group processes approach to the social psychological study of science skepticism.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | science rejection; antiscience beliefs; misinformation; fake news; conspiracy theories; ideology; COVID-19 |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2024 15:40 |
Last Modified: | 15 Nov 2024 15:40 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/39621 |
Available files
Filename: rutjens-et-al-2021-a-group-processes-approach-to-antiscience-beliefs-and-endorsement-of-alternative-facts.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0