Pollard, Ryan S and Hollinger, David S and Nail-Ulloa, Iván E and Zabala, Michael E (2024) A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 6 (3). pp. 1125-1134. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/tmrb.2024.3408892
Pollard, Ryan S and Hollinger, David S and Nail-Ulloa, Iván E and Zabala, Michael E (2024) A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 6 (3). pp. 1125-1134. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/tmrb.2024.3408892
Pollard, Ryan S and Hollinger, David S and Nail-Ulloa, Iván E and Zabala, Michael E (2024) A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 6 (3). pp. 1125-1134. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/tmrb.2024.3408892
Abstract
Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: tpred = 50 ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: trun < 0.62 ms, RF models: trun > 8.19 ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of tpred = 75 ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a tpred = 50 ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (tpred ≤ 50 ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (tpred ≥ 75 ms).
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Assistive devices; gait; joint angle estimation; kinematics; random forest; runtimes |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2025 13:15 |
Last Modified: | 01 May 2025 13:15 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/40644 |