Hollinger, David and Schall, Mark C and Chen, Howard and Zabala, Michael (2024) The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs on Joint Angle Prediction across Simple Movements. Sensors, 24 (11). p. 3657. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113657
Hollinger, David and Schall, Mark C and Chen, Howard and Zabala, Michael (2024) The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs on Joint Angle Prediction across Simple Movements. Sensors, 24 (11). p. 3657. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113657
Hollinger, David and Schall, Mark C and Chen, Howard and Zabala, Michael (2024) The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs on Joint Angle Prediction across Simple Movements. Sensors, 24 (11). p. 3657. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113657
Abstract
The use of wearable sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs), and machine learning for human intent recognition in health-related areas has grown considerably. However, there is limited research exploring how IMU quantity and placement affect human movement intent prediction (HMIP) at the joint level. The objective of this study was to analyze various combinations of IMU input signals to maximize the machine learning prediction accuracy for multiple simple movements. We trained a Random Forest algorithm to predict future joint angles across these movements using various sensor features. We hypothesized that joint angle prediction accuracy would increase with the addition of IMUs attached to adjacent body segments and that non-adjacent IMUs would not increase the prediction accuracy. The results indicated that the addition of adjacent IMUs to current joint angle inputs did not significantly increase the prediction accuracy (RMSE of 1.92° vs. 3.32° at the ankle, 8.78° vs. 12.54° at the knee, and 5.48° vs. 9.67° at the hip). Additionally, including non-adjacent IMUs did not increase the prediction accuracy (RMSE of 5.35° vs. 5.55° at the ankle, 20.29° vs. 20.71° at the knee, and 14.86° vs. 13.55° at the hip). These results demonstrated how future joint angle prediction during simple movements did not improve with the addition of IMUs alongside current joint angle inputs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Adult; Algorithms; Ankle Joint; Biomechanical Phenomena; Female; Hip Joint; Humans; Joints; Knee Joint; Machine Learning; Male; Movement; Range of Motion, Articular; Wearable Electronic Devices; Young Adult; accelerometers; gyroscopes; movement intent prediction; wearable sensors |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Apr 2026 13:56 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Apr 2026 13:56 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/40645 |
Available files
Filename: The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs 2024.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0