Deng, Fawei and Akre, Manali and Birn-Jeffery, Aleksandra and Cortes, Nelson and Tallent, Jamie and Finch, Emily and Shao, Xuerong and Liew, Bernard Xian Wei and Han, Jia and Neal, Bradley Stephen (2026) Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain. Experimental Physiology, 111 (4). pp. 2225-2235. DOI https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093432
Deng, Fawei and Akre, Manali and Birn-Jeffery, Aleksandra and Cortes, Nelson and Tallent, Jamie and Finch, Emily and Shao, Xuerong and Liew, Bernard Xian Wei and Han, Jia and Neal, Bradley Stephen (2026) Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain. Experimental Physiology, 111 (4). pp. 2225-2235. DOI https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093432
Deng, Fawei and Akre, Manali and Birn-Jeffery, Aleksandra and Cortes, Nelson and Tallent, Jamie and Finch, Emily and Shao, Xuerong and Liew, Bernard Xian Wei and Han, Jia and Neal, Bradley Stephen (2026) Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain. Experimental Physiology, 111 (4). pp. 2225-2235. DOI https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093432
Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate the intra-rater reliability of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in people with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to compare nervous system function between these groups, using a case-control design. We sought people with and without PFP to participate in PNS and TMS testing to calculate maximal compound motor action potential, maximal force, voluntary activation (VA), active motor threshold (AMT), corticospinal excitability (CSE), silent period, and short-interval intracortical inhibition. People with PFP also rated their current pain and function. Single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine intra-rater reliability, with standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change calculated. Between-group differences in PNS and TMS variables were determined using Student's two-tailed, independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Twenty-seven people without and 23 people with PFP completed PNS and TMS testing. For intra-rater reliability, 18 people without and 17 people with PFP returned for a second testing session, and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from good to excellent (0.62-0.96). People with PFP demonstrated significantly lower VA (P < 0.0001), higher AMT (P = 0.014) and lower CSE (P = 0.018). In conclusion, both PNS and TMS demonstrate acceptable intra-rater reliability in people with and without PFP. Elevated AMT and reduced CSE indicate that people with PFP might have a hypoexcitable motor cortex-corticospinal pathway, and lower VA indicates reduced recruitment of high-threshold motor units. These findings indicate that a neurophysiological mechanism might underpin the poor prognosis of PFP.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Adult; Case-Control Studies; Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Cortex; Muscle, Skeletal; Neural Inhibition; Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome; Pyramidal Tracts; Reproducibility of Results; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Young Adult |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2026 13:59 |
| Last Modified: | 29 Apr 2026 14:01 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/42810 |
Available files
Filename: 100475462.pdf