Jamieson, Matthew and Parry, Ellis and Parry, Luke and Russell, Rufus and Fish, Jessica and Gentry, Sam and Bateman, Andrew and Evans, Jonathan (2026) Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury: experiences from Neumind users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 21 (6). pp. 2608-2628. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2633300
Jamieson, Matthew and Parry, Ellis and Parry, Luke and Russell, Rufus and Fish, Jessica and Gentry, Sam and Bateman, Andrew and Evans, Jonathan (2026) Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury: experiences from Neumind users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 21 (6). pp. 2608-2628. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2633300
Jamieson, Matthew and Parry, Ellis and Parry, Luke and Russell, Rufus and Fish, Jessica and Gentry, Sam and Bateman, Andrew and Evans, Jonathan (2026) Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury: experiences from Neumind users. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 21 (6). pp. 2608-2628. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2633300
Abstract
Assistive technology for cognition (ATC), particularly smartphone-based apps, can significantly enhance rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Despite demonstrated efficacy, challenges persist in initial uptake and long-term engagement with such technologies. This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine factors influencing sustained engagement with the Neumind app over 13–14 months among individuals with ABI. Twelve adult participants were interviewed, and their app usage data was quantitatively analysed over nine months post-interview. Eleven participants used the app when interviewed 4–5 months after download (3 highly active, 3 moderately active and 5 occasional users). The six active users maintained their use nine months later. Qualitative thematic analysis identified six major themes impacting sustained ATC engagement: Introduction and Initial Use (recommendation by others, ease of setup), Perceived Benefits (increased confidence, independence), Technical and Functional Challenges (technical issues, reliability, simplicity), User Customisation Preferences (reminder features, calendar scheduling), Community and Social Support (sense of belonging, helping others), and Integration into Rehabilitation and Daily Life (integration with rehabilitation, habit formation, established strategies, timing of introduction). Participants who maintained consistent use reported tangible benefits, effective habit formation, emotional engagement through community participation, and successful integration into rehabilitation routines. Non-users faced technical difficulties, perceived irrelevance of content, and preferred existing strategies. This study underscores the critical role of early introduction, ease of use, community integration, and habit formation in sustaining ATC engagement. Addressing usability barriers, enhancing customisation, and incorporating structured social support may significantly improve long-term use and effectiveness of ATC interventions in neuro-rehabilitation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assistive technology for cognition; neuropsychological rehabilitation; acquired brain injury; compensatory technology; cognitive rehabilitation |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2026 15:13 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2026 15:13 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/42889 |
Available files
Filename: Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury experiences from Neumind users.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0