Siemroth, Christoph and Park, Yeomyung (2026) Are There Manufacturer Differences in Hard-Drive Reliability? IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. pp. 1-10. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2026.3679404
Siemroth, Christoph and Park, Yeomyung (2026) Are There Manufacturer Differences in Hard-Drive Reliability? IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. pp. 1-10. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2026.3679404
Siemroth, Christoph and Park, Yeomyung (2026) Are There Manufacturer Differences in Hard-Drive Reliability? IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. pp. 1-10. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2026.3679404
Abstract
Based on the Backblaze hard disk drive (HDD) dataset, we analyze whether the four major HDD manufacturers represented in the dataset—HGST, Seagate, Toshiba, Western Digital (WD)—show differences in short- to medium-term HDD failure rates. Using two different duration regression models, we find—holding constant drive age, capacity, form-factor, and drive temperature—that Toshiba's failure rate is slightly above Seagate's. HGST HDD failure rates are the lowest, about 41% of Seagate's. WD HDD failure rates are significantly above HGST's, but still only about 52% of Seagate's. We also document the effects of age, capacity, temperature and drive location on failure rates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hard disk drive failure rates; HDD reliability; manufacturer differences |
| Subjects: | Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZR Rights Retention |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Department of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 11 May 2026 12:56 |
| Last Modified: | 11 May 2026 12:56 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/43022 |
Available files
Filename: HDD_reliability.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0