Šunić, Iva and Šarac, Jelena and Havaš Auguštin, Dubravka and Ferguson, Robert MW and Archer, Elizabeth and Henderson, Drew K and et al (2026) The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 18 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70272
Šunić, Iva and Šarac, Jelena and Havaš Auguštin, Dubravka and Ferguson, Robert MW and Archer, Elizabeth and Henderson, Drew K and et al (2026) The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 18 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70272
Šunić, Iva and Šarac, Jelena and Havaš Auguštin, Dubravka and Ferguson, Robert MW and Archer, Elizabeth and Henderson, Drew K and et al (2026) The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 18 (2). DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70272
Abstract
Indoor spaces contain diverse microbial communities that shape human health. These microorganisms are particularly relevant to respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergies. Despite growing recognition of the importance of indoor microbial exposures, research in this field is slowed by differences in methods. These inconsistencies make it difficult to compare results and draw conclusions. This systematic review analyses 106 studies published between 2000 and 2025 that investigated indoor microbiomes in dust, air, and other matrices across homes, schools, and other built environments. We assessed sampling strategies, DNA extraction protocols, sequencing technologies, and bioinformatic pipelines, identifying trends, inconsistencies, and areas requiring harmonisation. Passive sampling, particularly dust collection, was the most common approach, while Illumina-based 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing dominated molecular analyses. However, variations in targeted gene regions, extraction kits, and analytical tools limited cross-study comparability. Ecological findings revealed consistent detection of bacterial taxa such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Corynebacterium, and fungal taxa including Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium, with diversity shaped by building characteristics, ventilation, humidity, occupancy, and presence of pets. This review highlights the need for standardised protocols in indoor microbiome research to facilitate reproducibility, enable meta-analyses, and inform health-related guidelines for indoor environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dust microbiome; indoor air quality; methodological harmonisation; sampling methods; sequencing methods |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Life Sciences, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Apr 2026 15:35 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Apr 2026 15:35 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/43118 |
Available files
Filename: Environ Microbiol Rep - 2026 - Sunic - The Indoor Microbiome Sampling Analysis and Emerging Trends.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0