McMullin, I (2013) Kant on Radical Evil and the Origin of Moral Responsibility. Kantian Review, 18 (01). pp. 49-72. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000283
McMullin, I (2013) Kant on Radical Evil and the Origin of Moral Responsibility. Kantian Review, 18 (01). pp. 49-72. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000283
McMullin, I (2013) Kant on Radical Evil and the Origin of Moral Responsibility. Kantian Review, 18 (01). pp. 49-72. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000283
Abstract
The notion of radical evil plays a more important role in Kant's moral theory than is typically recognized. In Religion Within the Limits of Mere Reason, radical evil is both an innate propensity and a morally imputable act ? a paradoxical status that has prompted commentators to reject it as inconsistent with the rest of Kant's moral theory. In contrast, I argue that the notion of radical evil accounts for the beginning of moral responsibility in Kant's theory, since the act of attributing radical evil to one's freedom is an inauguration into the autonomous stance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | autonomy; obligation; incentive; innate propensity; intelligible act; maxim; moral law; radical evil; respect; responsibility |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Philosophical, Historical and Interdisciplinary Studies, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 10 Dec 2013 11:20 |
Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2024 15:41 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/8247 |