Sutherland, William J and Fleishman, Erica and Mascia, Michael B and Pretty, Jules and Rudd, Murray A (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2 (3). pp. 238-247. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00083.x
Sutherland, William J and Fleishman, Erica and Mascia, Michael B and Pretty, Jules and Rudd, Murray A (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2 (3). pp. 238-247. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00083.x
Sutherland, William J and Fleishman, Erica and Mascia, Michael B and Pretty, Jules and Rudd, Murray A (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2 (3). pp. 238-247. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00083.x
Abstract
<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:bold>1.</jats:bold> There is a widely recognized gap between the data generated by researchers and the information required by policy makers. In an effort to bridge the gap between conservation policy and science, we have convened in several countries multiple groups of policy makers, practitioners and researchers to identify priority information needs that can be met by new research in the social and natural sciences.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:bold>2.</jats:bold> The exercises we have coordinated included identification of priority policy‐relevant research questions in specific geographies (UK, USA, Canada); questions relating to global conservation; questions relating to global agriculture; policy opportunities in the United Kingdom; and emerging global conservation issues or ‘horizon scanning’.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:bold>3.</jats:bold> We outline the exercises and describe our methods, which are based on principles of inclusivity, openness and democracy. Methods to maximize inclusiveness and rigour in such exercises include solicitation of questions and priorities from an extensive community, online collation of material, repeated voting and engagement with policy networks to foster uptake and application of the results.</jats:p><jats:p> <jats:bold>4.</jats:bold> These methods are transferable to a wide range of policy or research areas within and beyond the conservation sciences.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; horizon scanning; participation; planning; policy makers; priority setting |
Subjects: | Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Life Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 06 Oct 2011 15:22 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:41 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/898 |