Bartle, John (2005) Homogeneous Models and Heterogeneous Voters. Political Studies, 53 (4). pp. 653-675. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00550.x
Bartle, John (2005) Homogeneous Models and Heterogeneous Voters. Political Studies, 53 (4). pp. 653-675. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00550.x
Bartle, John (2005) Homogeneous Models and Heterogeneous Voters. Political Studies, 53 (4). pp. 653-675. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00550.x
Abstract
<jats:p> Most models assume that voting behaviour can be summarised by a single additive equation. There are good reasons, however, for believing that some voters place more weight on some considerations than others or use different decision rules. In both cases, a single additive equation will produce misleading accounts of the causal processes. Modellers should therefore allow for such differences. In order to illustrate these propositions, I examine evidence from the 2001 British Election Study, which suggests that some voters place more weight on leaders than others. I end by calling for attention to shift from causal complexity to causal diversity. </jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jul 2014 11:33 |
Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2024 06:06 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/9867 |