Clark, Nicholas C and Pethick, Jamie (2022) Variability and complexity of knee neuromuscular control during an isometric task in uninjured physically active adults: a secondary analysis exploring right/left and dominant/nondominant asymmetry. Applied Sciences, 12 (9). p. 4762. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094762
Clark, Nicholas C and Pethick, Jamie (2022) Variability and complexity of knee neuromuscular control during an isometric task in uninjured physically active adults: a secondary analysis exploring right/left and dominant/nondominant asymmetry. Applied Sciences, 12 (9). p. 4762. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094762
Clark, Nicholas C and Pethick, Jamie (2022) Variability and complexity of knee neuromuscular control during an isometric task in uninjured physically active adults: a secondary analysis exploring right/left and dominant/nondominant asymmetry. Applied Sciences, 12 (9). p. 4762. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094762
Abstract
Work is needed to better understand the control of knee movement and knee health. Specifically, work is needed to further understand knee muscle force control variability and complexity and how it is organized on both sides of the body. The purpose of this study was to explore side-to-side comparisons of magnitude- and complexity-based measures of knee muscle force control to support future interpretations of complexity-based analyses and clinical reasoning in knee injury control. Participants (male/female n = 11/5) performed constant-force isometric efforts at 50% maximal effort. Force variability was quantified during the constant-force efforts using a coefficient of variation (CV%) and force complexity using approximate entropy (ApEn) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) α. Outcomes were right/left and dominant/nondominant group-level and individual-level comparisons. A limb-symmetry index was calculated for each variable and clinically significant absolute asymmetry was defined (>15%). The only significant side-to-side difference was for right/left DFA α (p = 0.00; d = 1.12). Maximum absolute asymmetries were (right/left, dominant/nondominant): CV 18.2%, 18.0%; ApEn 34.5%, 32.3%; DFA α 4.9%, 5.0%. Different side-to-side comparisons yield different findings. Consideration for how side-to-side comparisons are performed (right/left, dominant/nondominant) is required. Because a significant difference existed for complexity but not variability, this indicates that both complexity-based and magnitude-based measures should be used when studying knee muscle force control.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | knee; neuromuscular control; force control; variability; complexity; asymmetry |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jun 2022 14:27 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 19:33 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/32826 |
Available files
Filename: Clark N et al 2022_AppSci_Variability complexity of knee neuromuscular control.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0