Bitetto, Alessandro and Filomeni, Stefano and Modina, Michele (2025) Can market information predict the credit risk of unlisted MSMEs? Empirical evidence from a novel matching procedure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 94. p. 102830. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102830
Bitetto, Alessandro and Filomeni, Stefano and Modina, Michele (2025) Can market information predict the credit risk of unlisted MSMEs? Empirical evidence from a novel matching procedure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 94. p. 102830. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102830
Bitetto, Alessandro and Filomeni, Stefano and Modina, Michele (2025) Can market information predict the credit risk of unlisted MSMEs? Empirical evidence from a novel matching procedure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 94. p. 102830. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102830
Abstract
This paper contributes to the growing body of research on private firms, particularly private firm accounting. We explore the economic factors that drive improvements in the default prediction of unlisted private firms using peers’ market-based information. Specifically, we examine how the market-based default probability of a peer firm can provide valuable insights into the often noisy accounting data of private firms. Our analysis delves deeply into these economic issues to uncover essential insights. To address our research question, we utilize a granular proprietary dataset of 10,136 Italian micro-, small-, and mid-sized enterprises (MSMEs) that are required to disclose their financial statements publicly. We propose a novel public-private firm mapping approach to investigate whether incorporating peers’ market-based information improves the accuracy of default predictions for private unlisted firms. Our mapping approach matches the market information of listed firms with private firms through a data-driven clustering technique using Neural Networks Autoencoder. This method enables us to link the Merton Probability of Default (PD) of public peers to the corresponding private firms within the same cluster. We then apply five statistical techniques—linear models, multivariate adaptive regression splines, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbours and random forests—to predict corporate default at the private firm level, comparing model performance with and without the inclusion of Merton’s PD estimated using peers’ market-based information. To explain the relevance of each predictor, we employ Shapley values. Our results demonstrate a significant improvement in default prediction for unlisted private firms when incorporating peers’ market-based information, confirming that the noisy accounting data of private firms alone hinder accurate default prediction. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance for banks to broaden the scope of information used in credit risk assessments of private firms. These results have important policy implications for financial institutions and policymakers, providing a tool to mitigate the challenges posed by the noisy information disclosure of MSMEs while ensuring more accurate credit risk assessments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Credit risk; Distance to Default; Machine learning; Market information; Probability of Default; Shapley; XAI |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Essex Business School Faculty of Social Sciences > Essex Business School > Essex Finance Centre |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2025 20:35 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Nov 2025 20:35 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/41906 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S0929119925000987-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0