Conti, G and Pudney, S (2011) Survey Design and the Analysis of Satisfaction. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (3). pp. 1087-1093. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00202
Conti, G and Pudney, S (2011) Survey Design and the Analysis of Satisfaction. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (3). pp. 1087-1093. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00202
Conti, G and Pudney, S (2011) Survey Design and the Analysis of Satisfaction. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (3). pp. 1087-1093. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00202
Abstract
We analyze the effect of survey design on reported job satisfaction by exploiting two quasi-experiments in the British Household Panel Survey: a change in question design and parallel use of different interview modes. We show that apparently minor differences in survey design lead to substantial biases in econometric results, particularly on gender differences. The common empirical finding that women care less about wages and prefer to work fewer hours than men appears largely an artifact of survey design rather than a true behavioral difference.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2013 09:55 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 13:19 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/7096 |