Items where Author is "Geary, David C"
 | Up a level |
Article
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2022) Sex differences in adolescents' occupational aspirations: Variations across time and place. PLoS One, 17 (1). e0261438-e0261438. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261438
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81. p. 101453. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) Gender differences in the pathways to higher education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (25). pp. 14073-14076. DOI https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002861117
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2020) The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020). Psychological Science, 31 (3). pp. 342-344. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904134
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2019) A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality. PLoS One, 14 (1). e0205349-e0205349. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205349
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2018) The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29 (4). pp. 581-593. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2017) Students in countries with higher levels of religiosity perform lower in science and mathematics. Intelligence, 62. pp. 71-78. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.001
Stoet, Gijsbert and Bailey, Drew H and Moore, Alex M and Geary, David C (2016) Countries with Higher Levels of Gender Equality Show Larger National Sex Differences in Mathematics Anxiety and Relatively Lower Parental Mathematics Valuation for Girls. PLoS ONE, 11 (4). e0153857-e0153857. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153857
Stoet, Gijsbert and Geary, David C (2015) Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48. pp. 137-151. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006