Landsiedel, Julia and Daughters, Katie and Downing, Paul E and Koldewyn, Kami (2022) The role of motion in the neural representation of social interactions in the posterior temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 262. p. 119533. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119533
Landsiedel, Julia and Daughters, Katie and Downing, Paul E and Koldewyn, Kami (2022) The role of motion in the neural representation of social interactions in the posterior temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 262. p. 119533. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119533
Landsiedel, Julia and Daughters, Katie and Downing, Paul E and Koldewyn, Kami (2022) The role of motion in the neural representation of social interactions in the posterior temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 262. p. 119533. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119533
Abstract
Humans are an inherently social species, with multiple focal brain regions sensitive to various visual social cues such as faces, bodies, and biological motion. More recently, research has begun to investigate how the brain responds to more complex, naturalistic social scenes, identifying a region in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (SI-pSTS; i.e., social interaction pSTS), among others, as an important region for processing social interaction. This research, however, has presented images or videos, and thus the contribution of motion to social interaction perception in these brain regions is not yet understood. In the current study, 22 participants viewed videos, image sequences, scrambled image sequences and static images of either social interactions or non-social independent actions. Combining univariate and multivariate analyses, we confirm that bilateral SI-pSTS plays a central role in dynamic social interaction perception but is much less involved when ‘interactiveness’ is conveyed solely with static cues. Regions in the social brain, including SI-pSTS and extrastriate body area (EBA), showed sensitivity to both motion and interactive content. While SI-pSTS is somewhat more tuned to video interactions than is EBA, both bilateral SI-pSTS and EBA showed a greater response to social interactions compared to non-interactions and both regions responded more strongly to videos than static images. Indeed, both regions showed higher responses to interactions than independent actions in videos and intact sequences, but not in other conditions. Exploratory multivariate regression analyses suggest that selectivity for simple visual motion does not in itself drive interactive sensitivity in either SI-pSTS or EBA. Rather, selectivity for interactions expressed in point-light animations, and selectivity for static images of bodies, make positive and independent contributions to this effect across the LOTC region. Our results strongly suggest that EBA and SI-pSTS work together during dynamic interaction perception, at least when interactive information is conveyed primarily via body information. As such, our results are also in line with proposals of a third visual stream supporting dynamic social scene perception.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Social Interaction Perception; Superior Temporal Sulcus; Extrastriate Body Area; Motion; fMRI; functional localization |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2022 12:36 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:50 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/33220 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S1053811922006486-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0