Brynin, M and Longhi, S (2009) Overqualification: Major or minor mismatch? Economics of Education Review, 28 (1). pp. 114-121. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.003
Brynin, M and Longhi, S (2009) Overqualification: Major or minor mismatch? Economics of Education Review, 28 (1). pp. 114-121. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.003
Brynin, M and Longhi, S (2009) Overqualification: Major or minor mismatch? Economics of Education Review, 28 (1). pp. 114-121. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.003
Abstract
A proportion of employees are overqualified for their work. This generates a wage premium relative to the job but a penalty relative to the qualification, and is therefore. A puzzle for human capital theory. A part of this derives from the use of measures of time spent in education for the calculation of overqualification. Analysing data from four European countries, we split years of education into two components, one reflecting certification, another reflecting time. While a qualification higher than required mostly generates a wage premium, time does not. The result is that the combination of time with excess (or deficit) qualification may make overqualification either a major or a minor mismatch. The probability of either outcome varies with the institutional arrangements of different countries? educational systems.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Overqualification; Wages; Comparative analysis |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2013 10:04 |
Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2024 15:43 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/7091 |